“The same way Harvey does: by building out an orchestration layer to batch up processing of documents and including document chunking for single documents that are too large to fit a single context window.”
in “Harvey AI” · 11 voices
NeutralDiscoveryUnverified voice
10 more voices in this thread
- r/legaltech · Feb 17, 2026
HarveyCriticizes“Everything you listed in your other post can easily be done in chatgpt with a basic prompt. You've simply confirmed harvey is a chatgpt wrapper in greater detail.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 17, 2026HarveyCriticizes
“They need to spend more time making a better product instead of sales/marketing bs.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 15, 2026HarveyValues
“It makes me more efficient and improves my performance when it comes to advising clients better than ChatGPT ofc.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 11, 2026HarveyCriticizes
“It's crazy people are still consider paying money on Harvey, when you can literally vibe code a better solution in a weekend.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 9, 2026HarveyValues
“Harvey and Legora are really selling infrastructure and orchestration layers (which is technically a "wrapper" but has a lot more value than just on-selling a chat bot UI).”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 7, 2026HarveyValues
“I, and most of my colleagues, think it’s a very valuable tool.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 7, 2026HarveyValues
“It is not simply a ChatGPT wrapper. It does a number of things that ChatGPT does not do.”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 7, 2026HarveyCriticizes
“Harvey is simply a ChatGPT wrapper built by non lawyers (ie no idea of what it's like to practice as a top performing lawyer).”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 7, 2026HarveyValues
“It’s also not clear how ChatGPT or Claude can be better when Harvey utilizes both of those models among others”
open - r/legaltech · Feb 6, 2026HarveyCriticizes
“It's just really difficult to justify Harvey's exorbitant cost when the majority of the things we need are free with our existing content storage service.”
open