Updated

Home › Luminance › Quote

“My comments about how Luminance didn't work at all for me have been downvoted multiple times and there's a four year old account with zero previous comments coming to life and saying Spellbook is great.”

On r/legaltech · Dec 19, 2024
Unverified voice about Luminance

Said in “Luminance vs Spellbook? Or other contract review software?”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-52c79144.png

More like this

r/legaltech
Luminance
“I tried luminance and it was worse than useless. Could not even pick out an effective date in our demo.”

in “Luminance vs Spellbook? Or other contract review software?” · 9 voices

CriticizesAccuracyUnverified voice
8 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · May 23, 2025ValuesMoved from Spellbook to Gavel Exec after trying Ivo, finding it gives the best and most contextual redlines across corporate documents, and found Luminance too expensive. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Apr 10, 2025SpellbookNeutral“In today's demo with Spellbook, the representative specifically told us that due to the OpenAI/Claude limit, it translates (with the various embedded prompts that make their system what it is) to 150-200 pages (depending upon document density).”open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 29, 2024SpellbookMixed“I would choose Spellbook over Luminance. All of them seem to have both good and not so good elements, which is likely a function of a) the current state of Gen AI, b) not enough solid training data, and c) user expectations not aligning with the reality.”open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 19, 2024LuminanceCriticizes“My comments about how Luminance didn't work at all for me have been downvoted multiple times and there's a four year old account with zero previous comments coming to life and saying Spellbook is great.”open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 18, 2024SpellbookMixed“Spellbook, I like the way it looks and feels better, but you have to build your own playbooks and I don't have the time to do that and can't do it at the level that IVO did.”open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 18, 2024MixedThe author finds the tool's interface poor and its quality below most alternatives, but it works better than Luminance and is nearly free. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 17, 2024LuminanceNeutralThe author heard a partner at a law firm uses Luminance and had high expectations, without giving an evaluation. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Dec 17, 2024SpellbookValues“I am an attorney and think Spellbook is stellar.”open
r/legaltech
Luminance
“From my experience, Luminance works well And it’s workflow capabilities are not something that other platforms have.”
ValuesGeneral useUnverified voice
4 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Nov 7, 2024LuminanceCriticizes“The system is still not able to indicate a CoC clause, as in one instance the solution indicated that a CoC clause was Article 4 (but the Article 4 was something completely different).”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 26, 2024LuminanceValues“As I mentioned, Luminance is a decent product, however each product will have strengths and weaknesses.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 26, 2024LuminanceValuesChose Luminance after testing on 50 documents for its AI extraction and easy UI, though niche data points need many training tags. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 25, 2024LuminanceCriticizes“The results are not as great as we have been promised.”open
r/legaltech
Luminance
“It’s also an absolute beast to set up, but once you get there it is incredibly powerful and the UI is slick.”

in “AI Tools I Use as an In-House Lawyer” · 2 voices

MixedPriceUnverified voice
1 more voice in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Nov 11, 2025vLex VincentValues“Vincent AI’s great for research. I haven’t found much for compliance yet.”open