“Standard licensing on business version still has 30 day retention and OpenAI can technically - and does on occasion - review your data (they are liking for illegal stuff like content related to cp or violent activity).”
in “Most Law Firms Should Use a Frontier LLM (e.g., Claude) through AWS Bedrock” · 18 voices
NeutralGeneral useUnverified voice
17 more voices in this thread
- r/legaltech · Oct 8, 2026ClaudeValues
“I actually set this up, it works as advertised. Cost is a wash, you can set it up in a day w/ AWS provided scripts and you own 100% of all data.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 26, 2026CriticizesFinds AWS Bedrock one of the hardest and most expensive providers to work with, citing confusing endpoints, difficult access to newer models and a support assistant that gave wrong answers, and warns that cheap AI packages are subsidized by training on user data. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Sep 24, 2026CriticizesPrivacy settings at Anthropic and OpenAI are only software toggles, so a Bedrock deployment with contractual no-retention terms is preferable. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Sep 22, 2026GeminiNeutral
“G-cloud vertex ai. Their Gemini model is okay.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 21, 2026NeutralSuggests running models through a cloud provider such as AWS because it gives access to several model families, while Anthropic's enterprise plan covers only Anthropic models. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Sep 21, 2026ClaudeNeutral
“Claude Platform allow using API or UI and you have ZDR.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 21, 2026NeutralExplains that models hosted in the cloud provider's data center can have inputs and outputs wiped after processing. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026
ChatGPTValues“Each time I read one of these threads I’m hoping someone will identify the distinction, but nobody ever does.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeCriticizes
“The AI provider does have the right and ability to review your non zdr data under certain conditions.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026CriticizesStorage in the cloud is not the issue; the concern is whether AI providers can use client content for their own model development. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeNeutral
“Claude Teams does not offer ZDR https://code.claude.com/docs/en/zero-data-retention”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeNeutral
“Well yeah that’s why we use Claude Team. We could pay Enterprise but it would roughly 10x our AI spend”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeValues
“That’s precisely why I’m comfortable with Claude Team and not Enterprise. Too expensive for marginal security improvements.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeCriticizes
“You’ve given a third party access to client confidential information - and it’s potentially subject to subpoena or legal hold.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeValues
“I am aware of literally dozens (conservative number) of firms using Claude Team as their AI of choice.”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeMixed
“Claude is easy, but Opus and Fable specifically are a little more difficult and required some additional requirements and approvals to data retention policies (going against OP's claim that you have full control over it).”
open - r/legaltech · Sep 20, 2026ClaudeValues
“Either Claude Enterprise or Claude Team directly have exactly the same relevant protections.”
open