Updated

Home › Legora › Quote

“I feel like not only is Legora slower in comparison to other models, but also worse at tasks all around.”

On r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026
Unverified voice about Legora

Said in “Legora not as great as ChatGPT in terms of reasoning?”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-69c1041e.png

More like this

r/legaltech
Legora
“Legora is timid and very lawyery. Really depends on the prompt.”

in “Legora not as great as ChatGPT in terms of reasoning?” · 10 voices

MixedAccuracyUnverified voice
9 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They do not have their own models and just resell other models with a markup to try and address the need for profit and overhead coverage.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026ClaudeValues“Almost all of the lawyers I know who have experience with both Claude and Legora prefer Claude.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 16, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora doesn’t use its own models in the first place… they use ChatGPT.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora and Harvey helped with that problem. But, that's no longer a problem, so they have no moat.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They barely even changed the system prompt”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraCriticizes“I feel like not only is Legora slower in comparison to other models, but also worse at tasks all around.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraValues“In the sense that I am allowed by my firm’s policies to use Legora, I quite prefer it.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraCriticizes“That's no longer the case, so having a third party between the user and the frontier model is no longer useful.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraMixed“Legora is going to be a bit behind, in exchange for more integrations.”open
Hacker News
Legora
“Switching from ChatGPT Enterprise to Legora at my firm was a godsend.”

in “Astra for Law” · 11 voices

ValuesGeneral useSays: works at a law firm
10 more voices in this thread
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ClaudeValuesRecommends cross-checking legal documents across multiple models (Claude review, GPT drafting, Gemini, Copilot) and still having a real lawyer verify. (summary, not a quote)open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“Since this is a thread about using ChatGPT for law, I should note that this is actually one of the most important reasons you'd rather hire a lawyer than ChatGPT to represent you.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026LegoraCriticizes“We also tried Legora's tabular review, there were also numerous halucinated provisions in our due diligence exercise.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ValuesHaving several AI models critique each other's work has raised output from a high-school intern to a second-year lawyer in a year, though it still does not match experts, and AI will increase litigation volume rather than replace lawyers. (summary, not a quote)open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“I find that when I feed contracts to ChatGPT (which I do all the time) it will try to find 50 things wrong with it.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeValues“The work still must be reviewed by an attorney - Claude is nowhere near making the kinds of judgments a lawyer would make about this content - but it has increased their throughput from 2-3 documents an hour to 8-10 documents an hour by killing the busy work.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ChatGPTValues“If both parties use ChatGPT to find the relevant laws or read contracts, they could come to an agreement without expensive legal fees.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“It's good for research and data organization, but terrible for drafting.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“In other cases/situations, I’ve tried just giving a model access to all the docs and saying “write a brief arguing X,” but it’s always terrible at this.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026NeutralNotes that Astra for Law scores slightly below Claude and Muse on a legal research benchmark, without praising or criticizing it. (summary, not a quote)open
r/legaltech
Legora
“Despite my bitching about Legora, it is still a very good tool and at present I can pass on the whole cost to my clients.”

in “Harvey vs Legora” · 10 voices

ValuesGeneral useUnverified voice
9 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Oct 17, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Harvey is the cryptocurrency of legal tech, it survived on belief, marketing, and FOMO when in essence it’s an LLM wrapper now with a post-trained open source model to make better margins for their insane valuation and funding rounds”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 17, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Both Harvey and Legora are built on sales team, not product quality.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026LegoraCriticizes“At least where I reside, Legora cannot be trusted to do good/accurate research.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026LegoraValues“Whilst Legora has its issues, nothing good prompting cannot fix.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026HarveyCriticizesHarvey's benchmark standing does not match the experience in practice, and financial losses may lead it to cut corners. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026HarveyValues“When you look at the benchmarks, none of the labs most advanced models are close to Harvey for what it does.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026ClaudeValues“It runs on our existing gpt or claude subscriptions we already pay for so it has been alot cheaper than Harvey or Legora.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 15, 2026LegoraMixed“I use Legora and the tool is both helpful, and a useless piece of shit that will get you into trouble and waste far more time than it will save.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 15, 2026ChatGPTValues“Both ChatGPT and Claude are better than Legora and Harvey.”open