Updated

Home › CoCounsel › Quote

“CoCounsel 1.0 and 2.0 sucked. CoCounsel 3.0 is much much better.”

On r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026
Unverified voice about CoCounsel

Said in “I think Legora may be strategically screwed”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-6ed49cd8.png

More like this

r/legaltech
Lexis+ AI
“Lexis has proprietary content, Shepard, and decades of embedded distribution. That’s an actual moat independent of WL.”

in “I think Legora may be strategically screwed” · 12 voices

ValuesData coverageUnverified voice
11 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Oct 10, 2026ValuesThe author's own command-line code on the same foundation LLM matches or beats Harvey and Legora prompts for general contract review, so output quality, ease of use and price are not the barrier. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 9, 2026HarveyValues“Harvey probably has even more of a moat because of confidentiality issues with most AI products, you might need to disclose to opposing counsel or the court which tool you are using, and Harvey is the one least likely to cause a problem because most of biglaw uses it.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 21, 2026ClaudeMixed“Claude has degraded to the point where it is actually useless. It cannot follow instructions, it cannot see the big picture, and it is a terrible writer.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 17, 2026LegoraCriticizes“I can't stand the card-based Word Add In interface.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“I doubt it's blatant but they'll be using something- your prompts, telemetry, an AI summary of your usage- all technically not your data.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Based on all of our conversations, they don't have a meaningful edge on any of those.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026CoCounselValues“CoCounsel 1.0 and 2.0 sucked. CoCounsel 3.0 is much much better.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026HarveyMixed“Midtier AI comfortable users found Harvey interesting and potentially useful and I am considering getting them subscriptions to use what is basically a wrapper.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026HarveyCriticizes“I personally think legora and Harvey prove that we are in a bubble. Literally gpt wrappers.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 14, 2026LegoraValues“As a question of motive yes, possibly, but Harvey and Legora are using the frontier models under the hood anyway and if you pay the frontier labs for a contract they will agree not to train on your data.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 14, 2026ChatGPTValues“The enterprise/business plan of a frontier model, particularly Claude or ChatGPT, is much better.”open
r/legaltech
Harvey
“Harvey probably has even more of a moat because of confidentiality issues with most AI products, you might need to disclose to opposing counsel or the court which tool you are using, and Harvey is the one least likely to cause a problem because most of biglaw uses it.”

in “I think Legora may be strategically screwed” · 12 voices

ValuesGeneral useUnverified voice
11 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Oct 10, 2026ValuesThe author's own command-line code on the same foundation LLM matches or beats Harvey and Legora prompts for general contract review, so output quality, ease of use and price are not the barrier. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 21, 2026ClaudeMixed“Claude has degraded to the point where it is actually useless. It cannot follow instructions, it cannot see the big picture, and it is a terrible writer.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 17, 2026LegoraCriticizes“I can't stand the card-based Word Add In interface.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“I doubt it's blatant but they'll be using something- your prompts, telemetry, an AI summary of your usage- all technically not your data.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Based on all of our conversations, they don't have a meaningful edge on any of those.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026CoCounselValues“CoCounsel 1.0 and 2.0 sucked. CoCounsel 3.0 is much much better.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026HarveyMixed“Midtier AI comfortable users found Harvey interesting and potentially useful and I am considering getting them subscriptions to use what is basically a wrapper.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026Lexis+ AIValues“Lexis has proprietary content, Shepard, and decades of embedded distribution. That’s an actual moat independent of WL.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 15, 2026HarveyCriticizes“I personally think legora and Harvey prove that we are in a bubble. Literally gpt wrappers.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 14, 2026LegoraValues“As a question of motive yes, possibly, but Harvey and Legora are using the frontier models under the hood anyway and if you pay the frontier labs for a contract they will agree not to train on your data.”open
  • r/legaltech · Sep 14, 2026ChatGPTValues“The enterprise/business plan of a frontier model, particularly Claude or ChatGPT, is much better.”open
Hacker News
CoCounsel
“I work at a law firm and CoCounsel[1] is pretty good.”

in “Higher-paid employees looking for work are having a tough time”

ValuesGeneral useSays: works at a law firm