“About 50% of the stuff it produces are hallucinations or just wrong.”
in “ChatGPT Enterprise / Inhouse Lawyer - Thoughts and Discussion” · 10 voices
MixedHallucinationUnverified voice
9 more voices in this thread
- r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024
ChatGPTValues“I feel pretty strongly that if you're not getting value out of ChatGPT as an in-house counsel, you should probably be thinking a little more outside the box.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTCriticizes
“By the time you have written a prompt and edited it, you could have just gone through the company database or internet for examples/templates and revised them a little.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024PerplexityValues
“From my understanding, they're built to alleviate this issue by grounding their answers by providing actual sources”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTCriticizes
“ChatGPT can’t even do basic data entry, I work in Tax Law and I was trying to get it to put in salaries from a tax year to correspond by name and ID number into an excel column, it was hallucinating random BS numbers.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTCriticizes
“It’s terrible at legal research. It’s also just terrible.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTCriticizes
“I've done some trials and demos and the specialized ones were absolutely better, but only in the sense that standard chat-gpt is awful at legal research and complex drafting, and speciality tools are only bad at it.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024
CopilotMixed“They’re pretty trash for just about anything else, and I’d guess that we’re 1-5 years minimum away from that changing.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTValues
“With ChatGPT, we can automate a surprising amount of the initial triage and review.”
open - r/Lawyertalk · Sep 3, 2024ChatGPTMixed
“ChatGPT is terrible at research. But it's quite good at making qualitative judgments if you give it appropriate guidelines.”
open