Menu
This weekThreadsBy practiceToolsArenaSignalsMethodMoversCompareBest by categoryBy yearFeature requestsBy modelEvolutionRatingsThe tableCorrectionsFor vendors
Updated

Home › Perplexity › Quote

“I got a near final doc from one the other day with a bunch of perplexity bullshit in it.”

On Hacker News · Sep 6, 2026
Unverified voice about Perplexity

Original thread Share

Said in “Nitter and XCancel resume service after legal advice”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-93959bb9.png

More like this

r/biglaw
Perplexity
“It saves so much time and finds cases others have not.”

in “Does anyone find that ChatGPT is just as good as Harvey for legal research?” · 18 voices

ValuesTime savedUnverified voice
Original thread Share
17 more voices in this thread
  • r/biglaw · Sep 14, 2026HarveyNeutral“It's not an original product in the truest sense, but it is marketed very well.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 12, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Harvey and ChatGPT enterprise offer the exact same controls regarding model training. Legora offers WORSE than chatgpt enterprise.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 12, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Try asking Harvey to create a PowerPoint. But Claude can do it just fine.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 12, 2026HarveyCriticizes“If you’re using Harvey, you’re being duped.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 12, 2026Westlaw AIValuesWestlaw has the better research tool, so Harvey should not be used for legal research. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026ChatGPTValues“ChatGPT, a more general tool available at modest prices, seems to do as good a job for that as Harvey, which is supposedly a more sophisticated product for legal professionals and is of course way more costly.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyNeutral“Harvey is just a wrapper for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. You can literally choose which to use.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyNeutralHarvey is just a wrapper around other models such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026Westlaw AIValuesWestlaw AI is less likely to invent cases than ChatGPT or Harvey, which can hallucinate, so firms prefer it for research. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026ChatGPTValues“I haven’t used Harvey, but I’ve used the Westlaw CoCounsel AI and it is embarrassing how much better ChatGPT is at legal research.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyNeutral“Harvey runs ChatGPT under the hood (along with Claude), so they are somewhat derivative.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026CriticizesChatGPT and Harvey only cover officially published sources, so firms allow research only with legal publishers' own AI tools that cover the full body of law and commentary. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026ChatGPTMixed“ChatGPT is solid in terms of putting out coherent and largely accurate answers to research questions, but I've found that I can't trust any of its actual case cites”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Harvey is no real value add. I don’t know how the hell it’s valued so high when the product can be replicated so easily.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyValues“I find that the databases these parties (Harvey and Legora alike) created of publicly available legal sources (legislation, guidance and case law to the extent published without paywall) are outperforming the training data or web searches every single time.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyValues“Harvey can be privileged, and not use the docs you upload and questions you ask about the case to train the model.”open
  • r/biglaw · Sep 11, 2026HarveyValues“Harvey doesn't do that quite as much and will pick up on a lot more nuance.”open
r/Lawyertalk
Perplexity
“I use it too and thinks it’s generally the best LLM, but I’m not confident the sources they pull from are extensive enough for case law research.”

in “It's The Cover-up That Will Get Ya.” · 7 voices

MixedAccuracyUnverified voice
Original thread Share
6 more voices in this thread
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 13, 2026ChatGPTMixed“Yeah once chatgpt spelled California with a K = Kalifornia, after that I realized I could never ever trust AI ever.”open
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 12, 2026Lexis+ AICriticizes“AI hallucinated citations and manufacturered quotes are not just problems in civil world; the negative impact can be far more damaging in criminal cases.”open
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 12, 2026CriticizesWorries that LLM summaries layered on Lexis and Westlaw search will narrow the range of cases lawyers see and weaken real understanding. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 12, 2026ChatGPTValues“ChatGPT does all I need (from legal research, to vibe coding, to data aggregation, to data normalization).”open
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 12, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“Some models claim to have inputted better code to prevent the anticipatory result, but they still get it wrong.”open
  • r/Lawyertalk · Feb 12, 2026CriticizesArgues fake citations are the normal output of generative AI and that lawyers who offload research and ethical duties to it should face sanctions and discipline. (summary, not a quote)open
r/legaltech
Perplexity
“Perplexity Enterprise Pro is $40 a seat, includes tokens, and is enterprise level with ZDR, audit trail, etc.”

in “Claude Team” · 24 voices

NeutralGeneral useUnverified voice
Original thread Share
23 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Jul 24, 2026ClaudeNeutral“Zero Data Retention (ZDR) is Enterprise-only, not available on Team.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 23, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“If you're using Fable, your data is being retained for 30 days for abuse monitoring.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026ClaudeNeutralShares a session closeout log template used with Claude to record files accessed, deletion of temporary files and confirmation that no external tools were used on privileged matters. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026ClaudeNeutral“Yeah, we require turning Claude memory off to prevent cross-matter contamination.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 13, 2026ClaudeValues“We are using Claude Team and very happy with it.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 13, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“Done start your legal research with Claude. You'll get hallucinations and if even one ends up in the brief you file then you're in hot water.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 13, 2026ClaudeMixed“I would agree with sentiments, teams is a step up but Enterprise is where it’s proper enterprise grade.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 12, 2026ClaudeNeutral“Team and Enterprise run under Anthropic's Commercial Terms, no training by default.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 12, 2026CoCounselMixed“The first version was sub par to be perfectly honest but early feedback of their new version is very positive.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 12, 2026ClaudeNeutral“Claude Team doesn't train on your data, but client info is still being transmitted to Anthropic's servers, you're relying on their security, not your own.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026CoCounselValues“Just get CoCounsel. You’re over thinking trying to mix and match to save a few bucks.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeMixed“Bottom line: the Team plan is a big step up from the wild-west alternative, but I'd treat the ZDR/Enterprise terms as the actual privilege boundary, not the Team UI setting.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“From the compliance side, it's a headache. It was too much of a footgun with a ZDR + new model = non-compliant.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026CoCounselNeutral“We are using Eve and CoCounsel with Westlaw to avoid that right now while I build out some automation with Claude but my goal is to do essentially what you're doing and tie Claude to CoCounsel to be able to do everything in one place.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeValues“When you crank it up to opus level extra it actually does this very well.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026PerplexityValues“I would use Perplexity Enterprise Pro- only $40 a seat and get the benefits of Claude Opus 8 and ChatGPT with a ZDR, audit trail, etc.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“Ultimately, they are warning that if you use any other tier (at this moment) that doesn't include ZDR or is a tenant solution that includes such, then your confidential information can be read by their employees in that 30-day hold.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“Anthropic states that you don't have confidentiality unless you use ZDR or a tenant solution that provides for confidentiality.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeValues“It shines in analyzing long AIA construction docs and summarizing them or editing them within co-work.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeMixed“I allow claude access to my emails for admin support and select documents I feed it to prepare stuff I want it to prepare, then I finish up the work myself since its not able to prepare final work product to my liking anyway.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“Claude Teams provides no facility for you to do an ediscovery of your firm’s usage of Claude.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeNeutral“If you have to do any sort of discovery or production of prompts and/or responses in Claude, Team won’t allow you to do so.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 11, 2026ClaudeValues“After test driving Harvey, the Lexus AI product, Chat, and Claude, we ended up going with a Claude team plan and keeping our Westlaw classic subscription (pretty cheap for our small law firm).”open