“Even the paid Claude AI consumer plans do not contain a confidentiality rider.”
in “Lawyers using ChatGPT: how are you protecting client data?” · 18 voices
CriticizesPrivacyUnverified voice
17 more voices in this thread
- r/legaltech · Oct 11, 2026CriticizesVendor documentation shows web search queries and EU data residency fall outside the no-training and DPA protections for Copilot, ChatGPT and Claude. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 9, 2026NeutralConsumer and business plans from OpenAI and Anthropic differ in data protection, yet none creates privilege and only enterprise API use gives zero retention. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 8, 2026
ChatGPTValues“The contract is no different from them using any other tool out there.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes
“A pivileged convo can get read by someone with zero duty to your client and you'll never know which is the risk to deal with.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026NeutralClient data can be redacted with a small local model before it goes to Claude or ChatGPT, though open-source local models perform worse than closed ones. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026ClaudeValuesLawyers should use the Claude Teams plan even as a solo practitioner and avoid putting protected third-party litigation data into lower tiers. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeCriticizes
“GPT will always spot something that Claude has got wrong or missed, and visa versa”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026
CopilotCriticizes“Copilot is deceptively expensive, especially Cowork”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026
HarveyNeutral“I think a big part of Harvey and Legora’s moat is trust by association.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026MixedNo-training settings on mid-tier plans are a good first step, but privilege protection depends on contractual terms covering retention, provider review access and admin controls. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutralThe firm uses an Enterprise Claude plan installed locally with training disabled, avoids ChatGPT, and never enters confidential client data. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues
“I personally see that as overkill given how much data attorneys regularly entrust to digital providers without that same standard.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTNeutral
“It's only the pure consumer level plans that require opt-out instead of defaulting to it.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues
“Both of these services default to not training on any of your chats or data rather than requiring you to opt out. So quite affordable.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues
“Both of these services default to not training on any of your chats or data rather than requiring you to opt out. So quite affordable.”
open - r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutralEnterprise Claude would be an approved tool while personal Claude or ChatGPT accounts would not be. (summary, not a quote)open
- r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutral
“This ruling says nothing about attorneys using AI and confidential information, it just confirms that AI tools are just as valid for search by authorities as is google, facebook, or any other digital tool on your machine.”
open