Menu
This weekThreadsBy practiceToolsArenaSignalsMethodMoversCompareBest by categoryBy yearFeature requestsBy modelEvolutionRatingsThe tableCorrectionsFor vendors
Updated

Home › Copilot › Quote

“It’s been helpful, but I want to knuckle down over the next month and learn this properly and systematically.”

On r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026
Unverified voice about Copilot

Original thread Share

Said in “AI workflows for an in house lawyer”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-b4b42bad.png

More like this

r/legaltech
Claude
“Two months of coding with Claude and Gemini produced a program that the Lexis rep was impressed by.”

in “AI workflows for an in house lawyer” · 8 voices

ValuesTime savedUnverified voice
Original thread Share
7 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Aug 15, 2026HarveyValues“I used Harvey every day but it comes with a library of workflows that lawyers can amend for their own use and honestly it’s been game changing.”open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 14, 2026ClaudeMixed“AI can generate consistent work products. You just need to program it and give it the resources to do so.”open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026CopilotNeutral“FYI you can select the model you use for enterprise copilot. It is set to auto, but you can choose for example GPT Sol 5.6 which is very powerful.”open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026ClaudeValues“I just picked Claude a while ago and decided to learn that platform and ecosystem thoroughly.”open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026NeutralIn-house lawyers should map the workflow first, use enterprise-tier tools for real contracts, require structured output and keep a human sign-off on every step. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026ClaudeValues“Copilot is fine but if you can swing Claude or OpenAI and use Claude Code or Codex or their work versions, do that.”open
  • r/legaltech · Aug 13, 2026CopilotValues“It’s been helpful, but I want to knuckle down over the next month and learn this properly and systematically.”open
Bl
Bluesky · bsky.app
Copilot
“If so, I demand your Bar Number because you offered negligent advice, like that and not to use Copilot, which I recently did, cross-checked by two more AIs to construct and file a complaint, so maybe I'm familiar with law, just a bit.”
ValuesDrafting qualityUnverified voice
Original thread Share
r/legaltech
Copilot
“Copilot is deceptively expensive, especially Cowork”

in “Lawyers using ChatGPT: how are you protecting client data?” · 18 voices

CriticizesPriceUnverified voice
Original thread Share
17 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Oct 11, 2026CriticizesVendor documentation shows web search queries and EU data residency fall outside the no-training and DPA protections for Copilot, ChatGPT and Claude. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 9, 2026NeutralConsumer and business plans from OpenAI and Anthropic differ in data protection, yet none creates privilege and only enterprise API use gives zero retention. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 8, 2026ChatGPTValues“The contract is no different from them using any other tool out there.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“A pivileged convo can get read by someone with zero duty to your client and you'll never know which is the risk to deal with.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026NeutralClient data can be redacted with a small local model before it goes to Claude or ChatGPT, though open-source local models perform worse than closed ones. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 7, 2026ClaudeValuesLawyers should use the Claude Teams plan even as a solo practitioner and avoid putting protected third-party litigation data into lower tiers. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“GPT will always spot something that Claude has got wrong or missed, and visa versa”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026HarveyNeutral“I think a big part of Harvey and Legora’s moat is trust by association.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026MixedNo-training settings on mid-tier plans are a good first step, but privilege protection depends on contractual terms covering retention, provider review access and admin controls. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutralThe firm uses an Enterprise Claude plan installed locally with training disabled, avoids ChatGPT, and never enters confidential client data. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues“I personally see that as overkill given how much data attorneys regularly entrust to digital providers without that same standard.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTNeutral“It's only the pure consumer level plans that require opt-out instead of defaulting to it.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues“Both of these services default to not training on any of your chats or data rather than requiring you to opt out. So quite affordable.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ChatGPTValues“Both of these services default to not training on any of your chats or data rather than requiring you to opt out. So quite affordable.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutralEnterprise Claude would be an approved tool while personal Claude or ChatGPT accounts would not be. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeNeutral“This ruling says nothing about attorneys using AI and confidential information, it just confirms that AI tools are just as valid for search by authorities as is google, facebook, or any other digital tool on your machine.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 6, 2026ClaudeCriticizes“Even the paid Claude AI consumer plans do not contain a confidentiality rider.”open