A voice on r/legaltech about Legora, Jun 16, 2026

Home › Legora › Quote

On **r/legaltech** · Jun 16, 2026
Unverified voice about Legora

Said in “What's your pricing on Harvey or Legora?”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-0e448587.png

More like this

r/legaltechJun 16, 2026

Legora

“We’re about 50 users and Legora quoted us €300/user/month for unlimited use (about $350).”

in “What's your pricing on Harvey or Legora?” · 7 voices

NeutralGeneral useUnverified voice

Original thread Share

6 more voices in this thread

r/legaltech · Jun 17, 2026ClaudeValues“Claude with custom skills and legal connectors set up plus proper context works quite well at $200/mo.”open
r/legaltech · Jun 16, 2026ValuesThe author runs a self-built AI setup for a small firm, which took heavy work to configure, but it saves an estimated $1,000 to $2,000 per seat per month compared with Harvey and uses the firm's own forms and data. (summary, not a quote)open
r/legaltech · Jun 16, 2026LegoraNeutral“We’re about 50 users and Legora quoted us €300/user/month for unlimited use (about $350).”open
r/legaltech · Jun 16, 2026HarveyMixed“Once claude releases a system, this will eat Harvey at a fraction of the cost.”open
r/legaltech · Jun 16, 2026LegoraNeutral“$400/seat for Legora. For Harvey, depends on what you take- Assistant/Assistant + Vault/...+ Lexis Integration etc.”open
r/legaltech · Jun 16, 2026HarveyCriticizes“I'm sure they'll have cheaper options as the value of their product tanks.”open

r/legaltechJul 14, 2026

Legora

“I feel like not only is Legora slower in comparison to other models, but also worse at tasks all around.”

in “Legora not as great as ChatGPT in terms of reasoning?” · 10 voices

CriticizesSpeed, qualityUnverified voice

Original thread Share

9 more voices in this thread

r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They do not have their own models and just resell other models with a markup to try and address the need for profit and overhead coverage.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026ClaudeValues“Almost all of the lawyers I know who have experience with both Claude and Legora prefer Claude.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 16, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora doesn’t use its own models in the first place… they use ChatGPT.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora and Harvey helped with that problem. But, that's no longer a problem, so they have no moat.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They barely even changed the system prompt”open
r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraValues“In the sense that I am allowed by my firm’s policies to use Legora, I quite prefer it.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraCriticizes“That's no longer the case, so having a third party between the user and the frontier model is no longer useful.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraMixed“Legora is going to be a bit behind, in exchange for more integrations.”open
r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraMixed“Legora is timid and very lawyery. Really depends on the prompt.”open

Hacker NewsSep 18, 2026

Legora

“Switching from ChatGPT Enterprise to Legora at my firm was a godsend.”

in “Astra for Law” · 11 voices

ValuesGeneral useSays: works at a law firm

Original thread Share

10 more voices in this thread

Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ClaudeValuesRecommends cross-checking legal documents across multiple models (Claude review, GPT drafting, Gemini, Copilot) and still having a real lawyer verify. (summary, not a quote)open
Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“Since this is a thread about using ChatGPT for law, I should note that this is actually one of the most important reasons you'd rather hire a lawyer than ChatGPT to represent you.”open
Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026LegoraCriticizes“We also tried Legora's tabular review, there were also numerous halucinated provisions in our due diligence exercise.”open
Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ValuesHaving several AI models critique each other's work has raised output from a high-school intern to a second-year lawyer in a year, though it still does not match experts, and AI will increase litigation volume rather than replace lawyers. (summary, not a quote)open
Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“I find that when I feed contracts to ChatGPT (which I do all the time) it will try to find 50 things wrong with it.”open
Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeValues“The work still must be reviewed by an attorney - Claude is nowhere near making the kinds of judgments a lawyer would make about this content - but it has increased their throughput from 2-3 documents an hour to 8-10 documents an hour by killing the busy work.”open
Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ChatGPTValues“If both parties use ChatGPT to find the relevant laws or read contracts, they could come to an agreement without expensive legal fees.”open
Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“It's good for research and data organization, but terrible for drafting.”open
Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“In other cases/situations, I’ve tried just giving a model access to all the docs and saying “write a brief arguing X,” but it’s always terrible at this.”open
Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026NeutralNotes that Astra for Law scores slightly below Claude and Muse on a legal research benchmark, without praising or criticizing it. (summary, not a quote)open