Updated

Home › Legora › Quote

“Legora did a great job summarizing the documents into a spreadsheet and helping pick out the several hundred relevant ones out for prep.”

On r/Lawyertalk · Jul 22, 2026
Unverified voice about Legora

Said in “AI Over Reliance - how to break away?”

Verbatim from a public post, checked against the original on every build. How we quote.

Share image: og/q-1a827778.png

More like this

r/legaltech
Legora
“I feel like not only is Legora slower in comparison to other models, but also worse at tasks all around.”

in “Legora not as great as ChatGPT in terms of reasoning?” · 10 voices

CriticizesSpeed, qualityUnverified voice
9 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They do not have their own models and just resell other models with a markup to try and address the need for profit and overhead coverage.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 17, 2026ClaudeValues“Almost all of the lawyers I know who have experience with both Claude and Legora prefer Claude.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 16, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora doesn’t use its own models in the first place… they use ChatGPT.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“Legora and Harvey helped with that problem. But, that's no longer a problem, so they have no moat.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 15, 2026LegoraCriticizes“They barely even changed the system prompt”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraValues“In the sense that I am allowed by my firm’s policies to use Legora, I quite prefer it.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraCriticizes“That's no longer the case, so having a third party between the user and the frontier model is no longer useful.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraMixed“Legora is going to be a bit behind, in exchange for more integrations.”open
  • r/legaltech · Jul 14, 2026LegoraMixed“Legora is timid and very lawyery. Really depends on the prompt.”open
Hacker News
Legora
“Switching from ChatGPT Enterprise to Legora at my firm was a godsend.”

in “Astra for Law” · 11 voices

ValuesGeneral useSays: works at a law firm
10 more voices in this thread
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ClaudeValuesRecommends cross-checking legal documents across multiple models (Claude review, GPT drafting, Gemini, Copilot) and still having a real lawyer verify. (summary, not a quote)open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“Since this is a thread about using ChatGPT for law, I should note that this is actually one of the most important reasons you'd rather hire a lawyer than ChatGPT to represent you.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026LegoraCriticizes“We also tried Legora's tabular review, there were also numerous halucinated provisions in our due diligence exercise.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ValuesHaving several AI models critique each other's work has raised output from a high-school intern to a second-year lawyer in a year, though it still does not match experts, and AI will increase litigation volume rather than replace lawyers. (summary, not a quote)open
  • Hacker News · Sep 18, 2026ChatGPTCriticizes“I find that when I feed contracts to ChatGPT (which I do all the time) it will try to find 50 things wrong with it.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeValues“The work still must be reviewed by an attorney - Claude is nowhere near making the kinds of judgments a lawyer would make about this content - but it has increased their throughput from 2-3 documents an hour to 8-10 documents an hour by killing the busy work.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ChatGPTValues“If both parties use ChatGPT to find the relevant laws or read contracts, they could come to an agreement without expensive legal fees.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“It's good for research and data organization, but terrible for drafting.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026ClaudeMixed“In other cases/situations, I’ve tried just giving a model access to all the docs and saying “write a brief arguing X,” but it’s always terrible at this.”open
  • Hacker News · Sep 17, 2026NeutralNotes that Astra for Law scores slightly below Claude and Muse on a legal research benchmark, without praising or criticizing it. (summary, not a quote)open
r/legaltech
Legora
“Despite my bitching about Legora, it is still a very good tool and at present I can pass on the whole cost to my clients.”

in “Harvey vs Legora” · 10 voices

ValuesGeneral useUnverified voice
9 more voices in this thread
  • r/legaltech · Oct 17, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Harvey is the cryptocurrency of legal tech, it survived on belief, marketing, and FOMO when in essence it’s an LLM wrapper now with a post-trained open source model to make better margins for their insane valuation and funding rounds”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 17, 2026HarveyCriticizes“Both Harvey and Legora are built on sales team, not product quality.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026LegoraCriticizes“At least where I reside, Legora cannot be trusted to do good/accurate research.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026LegoraValues“Whilst Legora has its issues, nothing good prompting cannot fix.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026HarveyCriticizesHarvey's benchmark standing does not match the experience in practice, and financial losses may lead it to cut corners. (summary, not a quote)open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026HarveyValues“When you look at the benchmarks, none of the labs most advanced models are close to Harvey for what it does.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 16, 2026ClaudeValues“It runs on our existing gpt or claude subscriptions we already pay for so it has been alot cheaper than Harvey or Legora.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 15, 2026LegoraMixed“I use Legora and the tool is both helpful, and a useless piece of shit that will get you into trouble and waste far more time than it will save.”open
  • r/legaltech · Oct 15, 2026ChatGPTValues“Both ChatGPT and Claude are better than Legora and Harvey.”open